There seems to be a parallel to Singapore, an island state which invested heavily on science and technology, but seems to have trouble apply it. A self proclaimed smart nation, Singapore wants to embrace the Internet of Things, only to prevent civil servants from accessing the internet by next June.
Its like an old lady driving a Ferrari. All the power, but decide to road hog and block traffic.
The big question is, you have already failed on so many fronts -- Failed to keep Casinos out of the country, Failed to control traffic and congestion with ERP and COE, Failed to provide a reliable public transportation, despite privatizing it, Failed to keep to budgets on big projects like Youth Olympics, Building of National Stadium.
Spending 87% of the cost on consultants for building a bin center is no way "prudent spending".
I don't understand why there is still so much fear. Failure has happened, no one was fired or took any accountability, why not allow more startups to go into Fintech? Why not allow Pokemon Go? Are you sitting on your high salaries and just saying no, because actually you don't know and don't want to look stupid?
I have put on a rainbow flag on my motorcycle, showing solidarity and support for the marginalized people in Singapore -- Yes the much bullied LGBT community.
I would have thought that most Singaporeans will not know what a rainbow flag would mean, however, an early morning at East Coast, I got called names, "Faggot, Homo, Molester"
This is so shocking to me, to a point that I dare not leave the flag on my motorcycle, in fear of people vandalizing it. Later, I parked at Marine Parade to go for breakfast, and people who are above 40 years old, (Not teenagers) giving me the evil eye, and again, heard homophobic slurs thrown at me.
I don't really see why must people HATE the rainbow flag. I mean what I put on my motorcycle is my business. I don't understand why are people threatened by "Equal Rights" for Gays? They are not taking rights away from people, they are not making others gay? They are not calling people names like "Faggot!"
So if there are equal rights, does it mean the bigots who hide behind their religion cannot get away with hating and bullying gay people anymore? Is that why there is so much hate?
I left the flag out at the parking lot on the motorcycle. Thinking that I should not fear, I am not gay, but I do support gay rights, what are people going to do?
At the end of the day, I found the flag on the ground, with the shaft of the flag separated. I really do feel violated. I can't even imagine how a gay person in Singapore must have felt, if they were openly gay, and probably would live their whole life -- as a lie.
Many students in Singapore like to go overseas for the "CIP" Community Involvement Projects, which is compulsory for them, and they need to clock in hours. When you force people to do things, many of them are either resentful or they simply do not care.
From an undisclosed source, Singapore Students visited Nepal and help raise funds to "build a school" It might be a noble gesture, but most schools in Nepal have been rebuilt with Bamboo and Tarpaulin, it may look temporary, but it works.
I don't understand why people think that construction is a "unskilled job". Just because Singapore companies import cheap labor in construction, it does not mean they are not trained. Simply getting school children to build a school after they watch a Youtube video is not enough.
Similar to this school as pictured, student volunteers actually built schools. They stack bricks and made cement. Yay...
However, unskilled construction in a country that was just struck by an earthquake -- IS A BAD IDEA. The brick walls are built without any supports, columns or foundations. Mixing concrete is also not so easy. Getting the cement mix to be of the right consistency, adding the right amount of sand, it all varies with the quality of sand / cement used and using the right amount of water matters.
If you think you are helping by building a school with unskilled Youths, I need to inform you that a building actually did collapse. Your voluntourism actually harmed people.
This school shown in the photos is actually done by unskilled, cheap contractors, and it is not stable. If you don't know anything about civil engineering, please don't "help kill more kids" when the next earthquake happens. Earthquake destroyed the original school before, and it will happen again. Please don't risk the lives of others and waste funds doing thing which are not critical. Nepal does not need your crappy schools.
I feel that the town council in many estates is out to make money and not serve the people. When you call them "lazy" as nothing is done to rectify the lack of accessibility after constructing the "barrier parking", the town council started visiting flat to flat to tell you about the clutter inside and outside your HDB flat, and ask you to remove a shoe rack outside the flat.
I don't even understand why they need to increase barriers at the multi storey carpark?
There was a slope for handicapped people, and 2 handicapped lots at the ground floor of car park. but after they built the "barrier parking", all the slopes around the HDB flats are removed, and as an able-bodied person pushing a cart or dragging a luggage, I find it hard to clear some of these very high kerbs.
I must think it would be very hard to access these carparks which I've never seen any handicapped person use -- EVER -- in the 15 years or so I've been there. Now, its IMPOSSIBLE to use them as there are no slopes and the barrier is in the way.
I do feel disappointed when town councils and public service creates more barriers and problems than help, and your tax dollars pay for their existence. I do hope they can exercise thoughts, but it seems like most of them just follow orders and procedures from someone who has never been on the ground.
Besides election time, I've never seen any MPs walk the ground, and when I talk to RC people or Town Council people about the accessibility issues, I NEVER get a respond.
There are constant construction going on everywhere in Singapore. In Toa Payoh, they sealed up the drain outside the library opposite Blk 79, create a wide walkway. It did not really do much at all, and there are more construction done every year which does not seem to add much.
In the past year, all the car parks have gone to electronic parking. I do support electronic parking in principle, but when implemented, it seems to cause much traffic jams as either the sensors are not sensitive enough, or connection is bad. During peak hours, this adds to traffic jams when cars are stuck trying to get into the car park and blocked by the barriers.
What's worse is that with the electronic parking, it comes "barriers". To prevent motorcycle and scooters to escape through the barriers without parking, all the slopes at the pavement are blocked. Yes, in order to make more revenue by prevent the few from parking illegally, handicapped people and people using carts to deliver goods have barriers that prevent them from travelling efficiently.
Usually, after much complains, there are more construction again to create more slopes, but the new routes are often far and not well planned.
Looking around Singapore. I realize that unnecessary construction happen everywhere. Terminal 4, 5, project Jewel, the new parks opposite Istana, and the old rail corridor is getting rebuilt to be a "green corridor". The one thing I don't understand Singaporeans is that they want "Nature" but they want nice walkways, toilets and lighting? Perhaps vending machines and food courts too?
I am getting annoyed at the Grassroots system where few "volunteers" consisting of contractors and people working in government linked companies hoping to rub shoulders with the "who's who" and hope for promotion. Many with motives join the system (and in senior position too) and it makes many other volunteers feel uncomfortable as everything that they do is for their benefit. (not really benefiting others in the community.)
I've always said that unnecessary construction is a sign of cronnyism, and I've seen this in Taiwan, Hong Kong, where the public gets mad when they find out, but in Singapore, media is so controlled and people seem very obedient.
You need to let everyone know that you are volunteering and which celebrities you have met as you are doing good. This is utmost important as the digital world say, NPNT (No Photo, No Talk)
2) Fundraise with friends.
When you do it alone, it may seem boring, so why not do it with friends? When all of you are having fun raising funds, and if someone asks, "What are we raising funds for? Or What will the funds be used for?" Simply ignore them and call them names, because they do not stick with the program.
Don't worry, Charities know what they are doing and your friend who question doesn't.
3) Fashion First
Even when you volunteer, remember, wardrobe malfunction can destroy your reputation. Even when you are off to the field to volunteer to visit an orphanage or to build a school, high heels, and a pretty dress is a must. For guys, a sport suit jacket will show that you mean business.
There are always photographers and camera everywhere, and you do not want to be caught in an unglamorous pose.
On the field, take lots of photos and post it up on Instagram... Pretend to work hard.
4) Take pity on people
"Awwww... poor thing, the Tsunami killed your family."
"It is so sad that you have a job but unable to support yourself... "Here's $2"
"Here $1 for the tissues I don't need. So sad you are blind... be grateful for people like me... Praise the lord."
5) Blame others for their misfortune
"Why did you take such risks?"
"Who ask you not to go to school?"
"Why don't you just go GET A JOB?"
Ask people rhetorical questions.. That is a sure way to motivate them to earn more. Seriously...
6) Start Judging others.
Now that you have done something, you earn the right to judge others. Ask Questions like
"Why did you share the Brussels Bombing but not Lahore?"
"Why did you change your profile pic after the Paris attacks but not after the bombings in Baghdad?"
I was invited to a SG100 event, talking about building a future of Singapore, nurturing young generation and moving forward, but when I spoke to some of the young organizers, immediately I was confused as they shout slogans like "I love LKY", "I miss LKY" like they were suffering from Tourettes syndrome.
When they showed trailer of 1965, and talked about how 1 man built a nation, I realized that there was something wrong about the event. There was also Singapore songs, Baey Yam Keng, Jack Neo, and it does feel like a Pro-Singapore event that somehow turned Pro-LKY...
The food served was indeed expensive.. Sharks Fin, Abalone, Tiger Prawns... And quality was not bad, but I wondered about the intentions of this "foundation" which was a LLP and hysterical members who chanted about LKY.
If I was not from Singapore, I would have thought that there was some kind of extremist religious convention going on.
I do respect LKY. He was a man with conviction and used ISA to wrongfully detain the co-founder of PAP and the rest was history to be rewritten, and young generation are still calling his name after his death -- with fervor.
Wonder if some group of people will be benefiting from using his name...
Singapore seems very advanced and "future ready" on the surface, but in terms of sustainability, I don't really feel that Singapore is all that Green.
Firstly, Garden city is an apt description because the amount of "forest" in Singapore is less than 4%. The use of plastic is very high. In many sustainable events, they still give out bottled water, even though Singapore pride itself on having very drinkable Newater tap water.
Next, on the issue of Solar energy use. It is very hard to sell back to the grid. Land Scarcity is used as an excuse for not using solar energy. Another excuse if Grid stability, something which many third world country including Nepal seems to be able to handle it well.
It is very hard to sell energy back to the grid, and there is no subsidies when going solar, unlike many other developed countries.
Singapore has no official national definition of poverty, unlike some countries such as the United States which have poverty thresholds based on household income and size.
I also feel that Singaporeans do not have a good knowledge of how poverty looks like. Many people think that a lot of people in poverty are uneducated and caused by: Low-wage workers' wages are depressed due to the influx of cheap foreign labor, and workers are left out of economic growth.
This is partially true, but the influx of foreigners also drive up costs. Transportation costs a lot more than before, and the train breakdowns are more often. Even the motorcycle, a mode of transportation which people who cannot afford to drive can get around Singapore easily is becoming unaffordable as the COE exceeds $6,000 making the cost of small motorcycles over $10,000.
The rents and property prices can easily cost $250,000 for a 4 room public housing far away from the city, and most new couples who cannot otherwise afford housing, need subsidies and long term loans as their combined salaries may only be $5,000, making the public housing cost more than 50 times their monthly combined salaries.
Increasingly, I do have friends who are not doing well financially. They are not what you expect of people living in poverty. In fact, many of my friends with diplomas, degrees and post-graduate degrees who lose their jobs above the age of 40, find it very hard to find another job with the influx of cheap experienced professional labor.
Many of them end up becoming tutors or driving taxis to get by. Some who have savings decide to start cafes or small businesses, and most of them lost their savings as shop rentals are unrealistically high, and customers have low buying power.
I do know many people living in what I consider poverty. I have a classmate who was lecturing in a Polytechnic, owns a condominium, until his wife got cancer, and after a few operations, fell into a coma which lasted more than a year. Medical costs piled up and to take care of his wife, he eventually sold the condominium to pay for medical bills.
In the final days of his wife, he took care of her and stopped working for a while, but was still left with a huge medical bill after she passed away. He declared bankrupt, and lost his possessions and his job, and teaches tuition and services the bill he owed. In all sense of the word poverty, he fits the description, however, he is highly educated, unable to get any form of financial aid, and all the training provided by the government schemes do not help his case, and this is not unique.
There are in fact many people living in poverty, but due to means testing and loads of bureaucracy, unable to get any aid. Some of them got into hard times, others live with rich relatives, but unable to find jobs as industries disappear when the government change economic directions.
Many of them do have jobs, but the low wages and high costs of living keeps them poor. Even with a degree, many people still live hand to mouth.
I've accompanied people to apply comcare grants, and the questions and checks made can be rather degrading. The process is not fast either, and many who already are desperate could not wait for the process get frustrated and did not get the aid they need.
The fact that the spending on social services from the government is much lower than the SG50 budget is troubling and I do agree, more should be done for the people.
I think the government needs to address the fact that rents can be increasing to a point where a restaurant rent in a mall can triple in a span of 5 years, and yet salaries of the staff increase by only 10% which business owners are not willing to pay more.
There are specific groups of people who benefit from the system, pay low taxes, have not capital gains tax, earning dividends, but they do not seem to be willing to give back, and the fact that the income gap is worsening, yet, nothing is done to address it will only further inequality.
Healthcare in Singapore is also getting worse as queues at public hospitals are getting longer, and medicine costs more. With the typical Singapore mentality, the doctors here, foreign and local, prescribe way too much medicine for typical coughs and cold, making medical bills relatively high. A significant portion of the population would rather not go to the doctor as they do not think they can afford medical bills.
There is a reason for minimum wage, and having an amount where people can work and not be poor is important. The reliance of cheap foreign labor creates overcrowding, and it leads to more social problems which does not seem to be easily resolved.
I also feel that education costs needs to be more affordable. For many years now, many bright students who entered NUS, NTU and SMU cannot afford school fees and have to rely on bursaries and donations. I've donated to many of such bursaries, but when I see that the university has record profits, I do question why is there even a need to charge that high for school fees when there is so much unnecessary construction and buildings which are built and unused.
On the case of SMRT, I recently took the downtown line, and was amazed by some of the shopping areas in the train station, and yet there are ugly overhead bridges. The stations are all very big in size compared to many other countries, and of course, the cost of building these stations borne by the government would be much higher than building a smaller MRT station.
I've heard many reasonable suggestions of building a longer platform so that the lengths of trains could vary if the line become popular, but it was not done due to the additional costs, but looking at the shopping space built, I do not understand why the government needs to build all the additional space for a private companies like SMRT to run rental business, when their primary business should be public transportation which they are not doing a good job, yet having record profits yearly, while increasing fares when oil prices are low.
With a "Satellite ERP" system which costs more than $556 million (Probably will over budget as government cannot handle large budgets) why is there no discussion on such big ticket items which serve no purpose other than "taxing" Singaporeans more, and ERP has never reduced much congestion as costs of vehicles are already so high, and depreciation may likely be more than the cost of ERP.
Many things do not make sense as I strongly feel that those who benefited more from the system -- the rich land owners -- should be taxed more to have more social services without the needs for means testing which can sometimes be demeaning.
There is a low of talk about sustainability in Singapore, Eco seems to be the buzzword, but in terms of action, with such a small land size without natural resources, and long hours of daylight, it totally makes sense for more businesses to go Solar.
However, in Singapore, any PV system exceeding 1MW must obtain a generating licence from EMA and register with the Energy Market Company as a market participant, even if all solar electricity is consumed on site. The registration is very complex, and thus may be costly to implement.
Since 2008, you are allowed to sell back to the grid, there are available technologies to cost efficiently do so in US and Europe, but the market mechanism in Singapore makes it almost impossible to happen.
As Singapore is largely dependent on fossil fuel business, with oil refineries, transporting and repairing of oil tankers, manufacturing of oil rigs, research and process of oils and plastics, all contributing to a significant chunk of the GDP, the oil and gas companies do have good friends in the government to slow the progress of solar.
Every year since 2008, there has been much talks, but till 2016, I've not seen much progress on businesses going solar. Here are some reasons.
1) Many businesses do not own the facility. When you lease the facility or land for 30 years, using capital to invest on something that does not really impact the business is what many companies do not even consider.
2) There is still much laws and regulation when you generate significant amount of energy. Even when the laws change, the perception is still, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO DO IT.
3) Is is complex to sell back to the grid. While getting a battery is an option, for many businesses with large roofs, they WILL produce more energy they can use and it would be a good idea to sell it back to the grid as they may need to buy some energy to use at night. Instead of paying to store, using the grid to store is a good solution. The mechanism to sell back to the grid is not so transparent.
4) Lack of awareness and knowledge that Solar Energy is 30% the cost of 2008. Yes, the idea of you getting ROI in 10 years does not sound sexy, but today, solar panel setups can get you back the cost in 3 - 5 years as technology improves. The panels are more efficient, batteries are cheaper, and the cost will only go down with more research and development.
5) Everyone takes energy for granted. There are not much blackouts in Singapore. Energy is relatively stable here and people do not think about sustainability because everything is out of sight and out of mind. There is no disasters, and what goes on, burning fossil fuels to generate electricity is also not seen by the public. However, if you live on the west side of Singapore, sometimes you do smell unpleasant odors from the burning of trash and fuel byproducts.
Well if you want to do something about it, there are many options to harvest the free solar energy.
Think portable. Even living in an apartment, you do get 6 hours of sun? Most of the time, this is enough to charge a portable solar device. This also mean that you can go out off the grid while charging your devices like tablets and phones.
Panels come in various sizes and attaching it to your powerbanks, you get power when you need them, and when traveling, you don't need to bring any adapters anymore for your all important mobile phone.
You might even consider a portable battery and solar panel. I've a set up for under $1,000 which consists of a 120W solar panel and a 400WH battery. This device powers my led lamps, fans, router, laptop, etc. With this device, nearly everything in my room runs off the battery which is in turn charged by the sun.
This device is also portable, and I can use this outside during a BBQ or an outdoor event as the battery only weights 6.5kg and the panel about 1kg. If you want to bring your electric guitar outside to jam, perhaps with all your speakers and amps, you may want to bring your own power device from now?
The future is here, we can all play out part to use renewable resources. I think it is time to look into solar energy, whether your government want to talk about it or not.
Was on the bus today, a lady with a stroller ran over an auntie on the bus and the auntie simply grumbled for a while and kept quiet. At the next stop, another stroller came up and ran over the lady with the initial stroller. The auntie laughed and was squeezed in a corner opposite the exit door. Everyone there exchanged angry stares and emotions were tense.
At the next stop, a handicapped person entered the bus and the auntie grumbled again, "Why do such people take bus, delaying everyone..." Then many people stared at her as she was forced out of the corner and it was a tight squeeze with 2 strollers and a wheelchair on the bus. The handicapped man shouted at the strollers for being in his way as he took the corner. On the way there, the lady with the first stroller got ran over again and screamed. The auntie cheered and mumbled that the lady deserved it.
The mumblings got louder on how handicapped people should not be on the bus, and how strollers should not be allowed...I was planning to record a video and then the bus just stopped at the bus stop. Something broke down.
Lesson of the day:
Too many passive aggressive bitches.
Bus Break Down...
All the bitches lose.
When you look at this issues, much of it is heavily politicized.
On one hand, businesses want cheap labor. They want to pay people below market rates and increase profits. They get government to allow more visas and open floodgates for foreigners to come in to work in these jobs.
When the foreign labor enters, the locals which cannot find work or have their wages depressed complain about the liberal immigration policies or the illegal immigration problem.
In the end, its about money.
In the case of Singapore, they attract the world richest people who pay little tax. How does the state benefit from this? Trickle down economics? Welcoming these people who don't want to pay taxes in their own countries with questionable sources of funds is not going to create jobs directly.
One thing immigrants do in most countries: They will buy properties and cause prices to go up. For Singapore, it means that the government can sell state land to private owners or developers at a higher price and gain more revenues which is not used or spent on public welfare, but rather, kept in the reserves for investment.
How does higher property prices affect residents?
1) Higher property taxes
2) Kids and next generation cannot afford properties
3) Cost of everything will have a "rent cost" -- INFLATION
4) Cost of doing business increase
5) All profits go to -- pay rent
For the small % who own a few properties, they will quickly realize that there is no point working as the yields of their properties can be more than their jobs.
How does this make sense? Why will rich people buying properties cause inflation?
Well, the liberal immigration policies in Singapore also allow other low wage workers to enter. But it does not end here. With the Free Trade Agreement signed, skilled labor can also enter Singapore to find jobs. They will also legally be allow to work in Singapore.
This will indeed create a demand which will drive up the rents and prices.
So how does this affect Singaporeans?
You get people in their 40's and 50's, university graduates unable to find jobs, and have to drive taxi or become tutors. The perceived "more hungry" foreigners from third world countries come and take the jobs at a much lower wage.
In many other countries, this is how slums are created, and in Singapore, you get HDB flats and apartments squeeze more people inside.
How does this benefit Singaporeans?
As a business owner, property owner, you do get low wages, and big demand on your properties. As an average Singaporean, you get to complain more.
Over the years, I've been to Africa, Australia, Europe, N and S America, Carribbeans, and Australia. Both to areas where there is extreme poverty and to large cities.
I would say that this problem where foreign born people outnumber the locals is fairly rare, is a issue with UAE and Singapore. In both countries, profits seems to be above the people. The low wage workers' rights are violated constantly and immigration policies are tweaked to give the rulers an advantage in politics.
I don't really feel that having more workers or foreigners cause a very big problem. The main problem is probably due to incompetence of the government to plan ahead. To have the different departments within the bureaucracy work together to benefit the country. If the trade industry needs more workers, then the health ministry, education ministry and national development needs to increase capacity.
If the reason for having cheap labor is to be more competitive, then commercial properties and industrial land should be also cheap to keep cost low. Having the mentality of, "Businesses are making money, government should also be making money..." does not help as the government should be seen as collecting enough taxes to provide necessary services, and not having hidden taxes and finding ways to collect more funds for vanity projects.
There is a fair bit of illegal immigrants in the country. I would say, most of these immigrants are in the country for work. However, this problem involves less on skilled labor and the graduates are less affected. Instead, the blue collared workers may see their wages depressed with the availability of cheaper labor.
There is also a spin of these illegal immigrants collecting benefits. And the people who are collecting benefits are probably the ones worried as there is a limited budget and the state find it hard to manage.
By looking at the military spending and corporate subsidies, social benefits are so small in the whole picture.
In the US, there is a lot more land, and property prices are not inflated by immigration and better managed.
I was at the Bukit Timah Hawker center today and the whole area is a big mess due to the construction. The carpark is FULL and causing a jam, and the surrounding areas are also very slow in traffic due to construction on Clementi Road and Bukit Timah Road.
And strangely, with all the chaos, the hawker center is rather empty. (Due to haze?) I've heard about this complain almost daily now, "Stop Upgrading! It only causes the prices to go up." It seems that their argument on upgrading and rents are not invalid. In my experience, all upgradings lead to increase in rents and increase in prices.
Going on Facebook, when citizens complain that PRs and Foreigners are paying almost the same for education in Singapore and Singapore education is expensive, the government increase the prices.
When Singaporeans complain about not having enough preschools in their estates, the fees go up.
Too many cars, COEs, ERPs price go up.
Train breakdown, MRT fares and Bus fares increase despite drop in oil prices.
People (foreigners) are speculating in housing market, Stamp duties go up.
It seems like having this 49 million excluding bouus (a year) worth of ministers in parliament their solutions seem to be, lets tax more and make it more expensive.
Nothing has changed much in the last 10 years except.. You guess it ... price of everything go up... Unfortunately, salaries don't increase as fast.
There are many ways to predict the haze. By looking at hotspots burning in Indonesia, the wind direction and the amount of smoke produced in Indonesia which is miles away, etc.
Can this be a disaster?
-- Of course.
Riau Islands, once the land with a lot of biodiversity is losing the forest at an amazing pace to loggers, turning beautiful rain forest into a baking hellhole. After selling the trees to loggers, vast tracts of land are cleared using illegal slash-and-burn methods to make way for plantations.
Haze was not much of a problem before, but due to corrupt officials in Indonesia, Greedy companies in South East Asia, it becomes a common problem which occurs yearly.
We are losing plants and animals forever, and seeing bad air every year. Prolonged Haze can cause respiratory problems. This will cost the country a loss in productivity. Businesses which are outdoors or not protected by the weather will also suffer a loss of wages.
Last week when the Haze persisted at the 200 PSI range, Malaysia canceled schools, but it seemed like in Singapore, the officials simply would like to just take the moderate approach, perhaps a 3 hour average or 24 hour average, and by the time, the air is really bad (unless it is bad for 3 hours) then they may start to act.
How prepared is Singapore when you cannot even find n95 Masks for kids?
Is seems like there is a lot of "tweaking" in the healthcare system in Singapore. There is so much advertisements on the Pioneer Generation (PG) card and how affordable healthcare is going to be.
I've spoken to many seniors, and for those who have not been to the hospitals perceive that the PG card works, but others still feel that healthcare is unaffordable.
I do not understand why healthcare has to be so complex. The ads on TV are in English and Mandarin, and the YouTube videos are in other dialects, but how many seniors go to YouTube? There are also people going door to door to explain the benefits of the PG card. I've followed them to my neighbor's house and even after 1 hour of explanation, everyone seems to be confused.
When I asked about how to lower medical bills, and recurring drugs, these agent have no idea how, and their suggestion was to visit private doctors, polyclinics and hospitals to see which one gives the best price. I don't get it, do they expect seniors to try their luck and test?
One question remains, healthcare is affordable... but to who?
My mom went to Tan Tock Seng on her regular checkups to get her blood thinners. I followed her to collect the medicine and heard many seniors getting turned back because they did not bring enough money. When I saw the bill, it was not any different from 4 months ago. The reply I got from Tan Tock Seng hospital was that the cards do not apply here.
With today's information system, especially in a hospital where you have a record and appointments, why do you still need to bring so many cards, and why can't the cards be used? In this case, the deduction of $400 was from my Medisave. My mother has more than $1,000 in her Medisave and she cannot use it.
What is worse is, this is 4 months worth of medicine, and I've hit the cap on my Medisave. So this means that I cannot use Medisave for future payments and she cannot use her Medisave as well. And as for all the cards she carry, None of them can be used.
This is not an uncommon problem, and for some cases like flu and fever, the PG card and the CHAS card can be use in private clinics to get discounts. And back to the question. With so many complex systems set up, so many different cards, and so much marketing for the different programs, I believe what the public wants is simply, can we have lower medical costs?
There may be much fear or anger with a certain party. This is a common thing. on social media, there are lots of angry people out there. Make sure you vote wisely during polling day as every vote count and a spoiled vote or a wrongly marked vote supports who you dislike.
What I'm concerned about is the perception of the PAP as a vengeful, all knowing entity. Many Government employees could even relate rumors of some people who had their career destroyed for voting in favor of the Opposition.
What is worse is people who are applying for HDB flats, getting government subsidies, getting grants from the government when running their businesses are afraid of voting for the opposition. Rumours like these have been passed around for so long, it achieved urban myth status; where everyone has heard of them but no one has been able to prove that it exists.
This feels like you are in an abusive environment where you have no choice in a democratic country to choose who you vote for. My big question is, why live in fear and continue to vote for PAP because of fear?
Stop living in fear, vote for who can represent you in parliament.